Home
Sitemap
My Blog
Awakening
OpenSpace
Child Abuse News
Write a Commentary
The Lighter Side
My Story
Statistics
C/A History
Emotional Abuse
      Types of E.A.
      Signs of E.A.
       Effects of E.A.
         - Bullying
      Stats for E.A.
Physical Abuse
     Signs of P.A.
      Abuse/Dis'pln
      Effects of P.A.
     Stats for P.A.
Child Neglect
     Signs of C.N.
      Effects of C.N.
     Stats for C.N.
      Poverty & C.N.
Sexual Abuse
      Definition S.A.
     Signs of S.A.
      Effects of S.A.
     Stats of S.A.
Sexual Abuse Victims
   Male Victims
     Female Victims
     V w/ Disability
  Disclosures
Sex Offenders
  Male S.O.
    Female S.O.
  Child S.O.
   Youth S.O.
   Incest S.O.
     Internet S.O.
Child Abuse Law
      Age-Majority
     Duty-Report
Intervention
Prevention
Stories of Healing
Child Abuse Stories
Exch w/ an Abuser
Visitor Comments
Letters from Readers
Link to this Site
Resources
FREE E-zine
Ask Darlene
Dating Violence
Privacy Policy
Site Search

Child Abuse Vs Spanking

by JWC
(Canada)

Child Abuse vs Spanking: 
California Assemblywoman Sally Lieber (D-Mountain View) has sponsored a bill (AB 2943) which would ban the use of an implement, the throwing, kicking, burning, or cutting of a child, the striking of a child with a closed fist, the striking of a child under 3 years of age on the face or head, the vigorous shaking of a child under 3 years of age, the interference with a child's breathing, or the brandishing of a deadly weapon upon a child...

California Assembly's Public Safety Committee voted 5-2 to advance the bill to the Assembly Appropriations Committee. The same place where a previous anti-spanking bill died.

At a public hearing, Sacramento-area mother of five, Sarah Berke, made the following argument: "As someone dead-set against the evil of child abuse, I also have a strong faith that calls on me to correct misbehaviour and rebellion when it occurs. This means a spanking once in a while. My faith and moral beliefs teach me to 'train up a child in the way he should go.'"

She went so far as to admit using a spoon to discipline her children: "Usually I have them go to their room, I go get the spoon, and we come in and talk about why they are getting the spanking and what they need to do to change their behavior," she told a news service. "I could be arrested and charged with child abuse, eventually tried in a criminal court and eventually sent to jail," Berke said. "My children could be taken away from me, or I could be sent for non-violent parental education. There are a lot of good parents out there that would fall into that category."

Come on Ms Burke. Do you really find it necessary to spank your children with a wooden spoon to change their behaviour? Maybe you should be sent to jail. What possible reason or benefit could there be for striking a child under the age of three? Do you not realize there are many successful forms of discipline available that do not include striking a child? Do you not realize that an older child could rebel against this behaviour and the violence could escalate? Give your head a shake. Better yet, educate yourself on the various non-violent forms of effective discipline.

Canada already has a similar law, which prohibits spanking with implements and prohibits spanking of children under the age of two or over twelve. Canadian courts are not inundated with parents charged with criminal child abuse as a result of this law.

I congratulate Assemblywoman Lieber. We need more people like her.

Darlene's comments to this Child Abuse Article titled "Child Abuse Vs Spanking" are at the last link below.

Email addresses, phone numbers, home addresses AND website/blog URLs in visitor comments are STRICTLY prohibited, and could result in being banned from making further comments on this site.

Comments for
Child Abuse Vs Spanking

Click here to add your own comments

Apr 25, 2008
Canada's spanking law...
by: Darlene Barriere - Webmaster

JWC, we're in agreement on this contentious issue. I've made my position on spanking known throughout this website: There are too many undesirable side effects to make this form of discipline both effective and appropriate.

As for the Supreme Court of Canada ruling with regard to spanking, in essence, they ruled on three issues.
  1. That parents should not be charged with a criminal offense and thus be subject to incarceration if they utilize "reasonable" corporal punishment as discipline. Therefore, they chose NOT to criminalize spanking, which was the intent and hope of child and human rights activists who challenged the law that allows parents to spank their children.

    The Court further ruled that there be clear limits and guidelines set with regard to the child's age and the use of implements for the purpose of spanking:

  2. Children under the age of two and over the age of twelve are not to be spanked.

  3. The use of implements is prohibited, as the use of implements or weapons goes beyond "reasonable" corrective force.
If all parents were reasonable, we wouldn't need laws that set limits; but the fact is, parents aren't always reasonable. Setting guidelines and limits with regard to corrective and reasonable force IS necessary. I applaud Assemblywoman Lieber for sponsoring such a bill.

Darlene Barriere
Violence & Abuse Prevention Educator
Author: On My Own Terms, A Memoir

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Child Abuse Article - Write one