Headline 4:
Legalized sexual abuse in Japan

Headline 4: A father in Japan admitted to suddenly touching his then 11-year-old daughter’s breast in order to "measure her sexual growth". The daughter, now a young woman, has exhausted all options in the Japanese legal system to make her father accountable for his act of sexual abuse. Her final appeal to the Supreme Court failed. They dismissed her case, effectively upholding a lower court ruling from May 2006 that stated the father had a right to touch his daughter’s breast because the act was fulfilling his parental duty of taking care of his child sufficiently to receive the child’s deep trust.

The Supreme Court dismissed the young woman's final appeal. Their decision was based on two factors:
  1. the lower court did not misinterpret or violate the constitution, and
  2. there weren't any illegalities in the court proceedings.

The decision failed to take into account that under Article 13 and 14 of the Japanese Constitution, "every person will be respected as an individual and considered equal under the law".

Comments to Headline 4:

I fail to understand how touching his daughter's breast is going to measure her sexual growth. I also fail to see how that act would in any way shape or form fulfill his duty as a parent. And furthermore, how in the name of Hades would doing so translate into receiving the child's trust, deep or otherwise.

Oh, but there's more to be livid about . . .

One lower court had the audacity to suggest that the young woman was psychologically pathological to believe that her father's "socially accepted" act of touching her breast is illegal and would cause psychological damage. He made this statement despite evidence provided by several experts who testified to the contrary.

How would the court have ruled if this man had touched his daughter in an even more private place? Given her age at the time, would he have been able to argue that he had his daughter's deep trust to touch her elsewhere?

What this man did to his daughter is sexual assault. A father—or mother, for that matter—has no right to put his hands on his daughter's breast any more than he has a right to touch her vagina.

The Japanese court system erred in their decisions, from the lower courts all the way up to the Supreme Court. Not one of those judges was listening. They set a dangerous president by legalizing sexual abuse and in the process, have made it next to impossible for anyone to successfully charge a parent with sexual assault. Shame on them!

Headline 4 originally posted June 7, 2007

<< back


NOTE: Information pages on this site were based on material from the Canadian Red CrossCanadian Red Cross RespectED Training Program. Written permission was obtained to use their copyrighted material on this site.


Back to Homepage

Page re-formatted April 10, 2014

E-book: Victim To Victory

From Victim to Victory
a memoir

How I got over the devastating effects of child abuse and moved on with my life


E-book: Victim To Victory

From Victim to Victory
a memoir

How I got over the devastating effects of child abuse and moved on with my life


Most Recent

  1. Can't Take Anymore

    Jan 16, 18 11:41 AM

    My father was always a good father, and a good husband, until 2008. He used to go out of the country because he's a musician, and when he came home in

    Read More

  2. Slowly Beginning Recovery

    Jan 12, 18 09:20 AM

    When I was 12 years I was sexually assaulted by a boy in my math class. The teacher made me sit next to him, ignoring my attempts to get him to change

    Read More

  3. This is on YOU!

    Jan 11, 18 08:51 AM

    I desperately scramble up the stairs, trying to escape the drunken monster behind me. Once under the safety of my bed, I silently wait. Suddenly my covers

    Read More